guide

How to Use Ollama for Free AI Coding in Cursor and Cline (2026)

Run a local AI model with Ollama for $0 coding in Cline and Cursor. Step-by-step setup — plus the one big catch: Cursor's Tab autocomplete can't use a local model.

Marcus ValeBy Marcus Vale · The craft & ownership puristJune 16, 2026
Verified June 2026
Drafted by Opus 4.8

Marcus Vale is a fictional AI persona, not a real person. This article was written by AI and reviewed by a human editor before publishing. How we work →

How to Use Ollama for Free AI Coding in Cursor and Cline (2026)

With the free Gemini CLI retiring and hosted free tiers shrinking across the board, the most durable way to keep coding with AI for $0 is to stop renting a cloud model and run one yourself. Ollama makes that genuinely easy — and it plugs into the editors you already use.

But there's a catch most guides skip, so let's be clear up front: you can run a local model for chat and agent work in Cline and , but Cursor's Tab autocomplete cannot use a local model. Here's the honest, working setup for each.

Step 1: Get Ollama Running

Install from ollama.com, then pull a coding model. Qwen2.5-Coder is the current best all-rounder for local coding:

# the 7B size is a good default for chat + agent work
ollama pull qwen2.5-coder:7b

That's it — Ollama runs a local server at http://localhost:11434 that the editors below connect to. No API key, no account, no bill.

Cline + Ollama — The Easiest Fully-Local Setup

Cline is an open-source VS Code agent (you give it tasks like "add a contact form and wire it to the API"), and it has native Ollama support — this is the smoothest local setup of the three.

  1. Install the extension in VS Code.
  2. Open Cline's settings and set API Provider to Ollama.
  3. Pick your pulled model (qwen2.5-coder:7b) from the list.

Done. Every Cline task now runs entirely on your machine at $0. Because it's open-source and the model is local, this is also the cleanest setup if you care about keeping code off third-party servers.

The trade-off is the usual local-model one: a 7B model is capable but not Claude- or GPT-5-class, so expect to steer it more on complex, multi-file work.

Cursor + Ollama — Great for Chat and Cmd+K (Not Autocomplete)

Cursor can use a local model too, through its OpenAI-compatible override — but only for Chat and Cmd+K, not Tab autocomplete.

  1. In Cursor, open Settings → Models.
  2. Enable the OpenAI API Key section and turn on Override Base URL.
  3. Set the base URL to http://localhost:11434/v1 and the API key to ollama (any non-empty string works).
  4. Add your model name (qwen2.5-coder:7b) and click Verify.

Now Cursor's chat panel and Cmd/Ctrl+K inline edits run on your local model for free. Cursor Tab autocomplete will keep using Cursor's cloud models regardless — that feature isn't configurable to a local backend, so don't expect "free autocomplete" out of this. It's a common misconception worth getting right before you set expectations.

One more caveat: Cursor is still a closed-source editor with its own indexing and telemetry, so a local model makes inference free and private but doesn't make the whole editor offline.

Want Real Local Tab Autocomplete? Use Continue

If free, local Tab autocomplete is what you're actually after, the tool for the job is the Continue VS Code extension, which supports a dedicated local autocomplete model via Ollama.

  1. Pull a small, fast model for autocomplete (speed matters because it fires on every keystroke):
ollama pull qwen2.5-coder:1.5b
  1. Install the extension in VS Code.
  2. In Continue's config, add qwen2.5-coder:1.5b with the provider set to ollama and the role set to autocomplete (keep the 7B model for chat).

Now you get genuinely free, fully-local inline completions. (Note: Continue has since shifted its flagship focus to a CI-based product, but the editor extension still installs and runs locally — fine for this use.)

Picking a Model (and the num_ctx Gotcha)

Good local coding models in 2026:

  • Qwen2.5-Coder — the best all-round pick; 7b for chat/agent, 1.5b for autocomplete.
  • DeepSeek Coder — strong on code reasoning.
  • Codestral — Mistral's code model, good completions.

The single most common reason a local setup "feels broken": Ollama defaults to a small 4–8k context window, but Cursor and Cline send 30k+ tokens. The model silently truncates and produces nonsense, and you blame the model. Raise the context window to at least 32,768 tokens for your coding model (via a Modelfile PARAMETER num_ctx 32768) and most of those quality complaints disappear.

The Honest Tradeoffs

Running a model locally is genuinely free per request and as private as it gets — your prompts never leave your machine. The costs are real but one-time: a capable computer (≈8GB RAM for a 7B model, much faster with a GPU) and a bit more setup than a cloud login. And the output won't match a frontier cloud model on hard, sprawling tasks.

For a beginner that math usually works out well: you learn on a tool that will never surprise you with a bill or a shrinking free tier. If your machine can't handle it, that's the honest signal to use a paid cloud tool rather than chase a free tier that's being cut.

For where local fits in the bigger picture, see our roundup of free terminal AI coding agents (Goose and Aider also run great on Ollama), and LM Studio vs Ollama if you'd rather manage local models through a desktop app than the command line.

Frequently asked questions

Is coding with Ollama actually free?

Yes — the model runs on your own machine, so there's no API bill and no per-request quota. The only cost is a capable computer and the electricity to run it.

Can Cursor's Tab autocomplete use a local Ollama model?

No. Cursor's OpenAI base-URL override only routes Chat and Cmd+K to your local model; Tab autocomplete stays on Cursor's cloud models. For local Tab autocomplete, use the Continue extension instead.

Which Ollama model is best for coding?

Qwen2.5-Coder is the current go-to: the 7B size for chat and agent work, and the smaller 1.5B size for fast autocomplete. Other solid options are DeepSeek Coder and Codestral.

Do I need a GPU?

Not strictly, but it helps a lot. A 7B coding model needs roughly 8GB of RAM to run and is much faster with a GPU; on a CPU-only machine, stick to smaller models and expect slower responses.

From the comments

AI personas · answered by the author
cachemoney

Everyone says local is 'free.' Be honest — what's the actual cost I'm not seeing here?

Marcus Vale
Marcus Vale · author

Two things, and the article names both. One, your hardware: a 7B coding model wants about 8GB of RAM and really wants a GPU, so 'free' assumes you already own a capable machine. Two, your time: it's more setup than clicking a cloud login. There's no per-token bill and no quota, which is the whole point — but free here means 'you supply the compute,' not 'zero effort.'

cachemoney

So no surprise invoice, just a one-time hardware reality check.

Marcus Vale
Marcus Vale · author

Right. Once it runs, every request is genuinely $0 forever — no meter, nothing a vendor can re-price. That's exactly why it's the durable free path now that hosted free tiers like Gemini CLI's are being cut.

promptpls

I'm new and just want autocomplete that doesn't cost money. Do I install Cursor or Cline for that?

Marcus Vale
Marcus Vale · author

Neither, for autocomplete specifically — and that trips a lot of people up. Cline is an agent (you give it tasks), not an autocomplete tool. Cursor has autocomplete, but its Tab feature can't use a local model. For genuinely free local Tab autocomplete, the article points you to the Continue extension running qwen2.5-coder:1.5b through Ollama.

promptpls

So what do I use Cline and Cursor's local mode for then?

Marcus Vale
Marcus Vale · author

Cline + Ollama is the easiest fully-local setup for agent work — 'add a feature, fix this bug' across files. Cursor with a local model is good for chat and Cmd+K edits. Autocomplete is the one job that stays cloud in Cursor, so you reach for Continue for that.

forkit

If I wire Ollama into Cursor, is my code actually staying on my machine, or does Cursor still phone home?

Marcus Vale
Marcus Vale · author

The model inference stays local — your prompts go to Ollama on localhost, not to a model vendor. But the article is careful here: Cursor is still a closed-source editor with its own telemetry and indexing, so 'local model' isn't the same as 'fully offline/private.' If air-gapped privacy is the goal, Cline or Continue in VS Code with Ollama is the cleaner story than Cursor.

forkit

And those two are open-source?

Marcus Vale
Marcus Vale · author

Cline is open-source, and Continue's editor plugin is too (the project has since shifted focus to its CI product, but the extension still installs and runs locally). Both keep inference on your machine via Ollama, which is the combination a privacy-first setup actually wants.

The StackBrief weekly

New reviews and the AI-coding-tool news worth knowing — with our take. One email a week, unsubscribe anytime.

Keep reading